A video case brief of Hammer v. Dagenhart, 247 U.S. Read the full-text case brief at In 1916, in response to increasing concerns over child labor conditions in mills and factories, Congress passed the Keating-Owen Act which prohibited goods made by children under a certain age from being sold in interstate commerce.
Table of Contents. Contracts Keyed to Farnsworth. Add to Library. Law Dictionary. Law Dictionary Featuring Black's Law Dictionary, 2nd Ed. Font size -+ Reset. Tool box Close Table of Contents. Add to Library. Law Dictionary. Unmute @dr_boroff Mute @dr_boroff Follow Follow @dr_boroff Following Following @dr_boroff Unfollow Unfollow @dr_boroff Blocked Blocked @dr_boroff Unblock Unblock @dr_boroff Pending Pending follow request from @dr_boroff Cancel Cancel your follow request to @dr_boroff.
Dagenhart (plaintiff) brought suit on behalf of himself and his two sons, who were minor children employed in a cotton mill in North Carolina, against Hammer (defendant), a United States attorney, alleging that the Act was an unconstitutional exercise of Congress’s Commerce Clause Power. The District Court for the Western District of North Carolina held that Congress acted unconstitutionally in attempting to regulate a purely local matter.
Grafik otpuskov v excel diagramma. Ou may use to communicate or share data with others in an organization, society or audience, or to find out a problematic element in a bigger process.
Both Hammer and the United States appealed to the United States Supreme Court.